A. O. Smith vs Watts Water Technologies
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put A. O. Smith and Watts Water Technologies side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- A. O. Smith is the larger business, with $3.8B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $2.4B for Watts Water Technologies, about 1.6 times as much.
- Watts Water Technologies grew revenue faster (8.3%, against 0.3%).
- A. O. Smith kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (19.0% operating margin, against 18.4%).
- A. O. Smith earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (30.7%, against 20.5%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Watts Water Technologies’s earnings: a P/E of 32.1x against 17.2x for A. O. Smith.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
A. O. Smith
AOS
5/11
Operating marginNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityShare count change
Watts Water Technologies
WTS
6/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginFCF marginPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | AOS FY25 | WTS FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $8.5B | $12.3B |
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.4B |
| Free cash flow | $546M | $356M |
| Net income | $546M | $341M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 0.3% | 8.3% |
| 5-year growth | 5.8% | 10.1% |
| Share count change | −3.5% | 0.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.8% | 49.5% |
| Operating margin | 19.0% | 18.4% |
| Net margin | 14.3% | 14.0% |
| FCF margin | 14.3% | 14.6% |
| Return on capital | 30.7% | 20.5% |
| Return on equity | 29.2% | 18.3% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$38.2M | −$205M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.1x | −0.4x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $597M | $82.9M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 17.2x | 32.1x |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

