Charles River Laboratories vs Medpace
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Charles River Laboratories and Medpace side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Charles River Laboratories is the larger business, with $4.0B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $2.5B for Medpace, about 1.6 times as much.
- Medpace grew revenue faster (20.0%, against −0.9%).
- Medpace kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (21.1% operating margin, against 0.6%).
- Medpace turned more of its sales into free cash flow (27.0% FCF margin, against 12.9%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Charles River Laboratories
CRL
0/9
Medpace
MEDP
8/9
Revenue growth5-year growthOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CRL FY25 | MEDP FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $17.1B | $19.2B |
| Revenue | $4.0B | $2.5B |
| Free cash flow | $518M | $682M |
| Net income | −$144M | $451M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | −0.9% | 20.0% |
| 5-year growth | 6.6% | 22.3% |
| Share count change | −4.0% | −7.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | 0.6% | 21.1% |
| Net margin | −3.6% | 17.8% |
| FCF margin | 12.9% | 27.0% |
| Return on capital | 0.4% | — |
| Return on equity | −4.4% | 70.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.9B | −$497M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.5x | −0.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $361M | $917M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 37.6x |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

