Exelon vs Southern
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Exelon and Southern side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Southern is the larger business, with $29.6B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $24.3B for Exelon.
- Southern grew revenue faster (10.6%, against 5.3%).
- Southern kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (24.7% operating margin, against 21.2%).
- Exelon turned more of its sales into free cash flow (−9.4% FCF margin, against −9.9%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Exelon
EXC
3/10
5-year growthFCF marginPiotroski F-score
Southern
SO
7/10
Revenue growthOperating marginNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | EXC FY25 | SO FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $45.7B | $104.4B |
| Revenue | $24.3B | $29.6B |
| Free cash flow | −$2.3B | −$2.9B |
| Net income | $2.8B | $4.3B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 5.3% | 10.6% |
| 5-year growth | 7.8% | 7.7% |
| Share count change | 0.9% | 0.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | 21.2% | 24.7% |
| Net margin | 11.4% | 14.7% |
| FCF margin | −9.4% | −9.9% |
| Return on capital | 5.7% | 5.8% |
| Return on equity | 9.9% | 12.5% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $49.4B | $71.0B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.6x | 5.3x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.6B | $3.0B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 23.7x |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 4 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

