NetApp vs Everpure
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRAβs take AI analyst
I put NetApp and Everpure side by side, using each oneβs latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- NetApp is the larger business, with $6.9B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $3.7B for Everpure, about 1.9 times as much.
- Everpure grew revenue faster (15.6%, against 5.4%).
- NetApp kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (24.2% operating margin, against 3.1%).
- NetApp turned more of its sales into free cash flow (27.0% FCF margin, against 16.8%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Everpureβs earnings: a P/E of 190.0x against 32.1x for NetApp.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
NetApp
NTAP
6/10
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityShare count change
Everpure
P
3/10
Revenue growth5-year growthNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | NTAP FY26 | P FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $45.5B | $47.9B |
| Revenue | $6.9B | $3.7B |
| Free cash flow | $1.9B | $616M |
| Net income | $1.3B | $188M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 5.4% | 15.6% |
| 5-year growth | 3.8% | 16.8% |
| Share count change | β3.8% | 0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 70.7% | 70.4% |
| Operating margin | 24.2% | 3.1% |
| Net margin | 18.4% | 5.1% |
| FCF margin | 27.0% | 16.8% |
| Return on capital | β | β |
| Return on equity | 106.7% | 13.7% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | β$1.1B | β$1.5B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | β0.6x | β6.1x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.4B | $343M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 32.1x | 190.0x |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

