Performance Food Group vs Sysco
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Performance Food Group and Sysco side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Sysco is the larger business, with $84.6B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $67.8B for Performance Food Group.
- Performance Food Group grew revenue faster (7.2%, against 3.9%).
- Sysco kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (3.7% operating margin, against 1.3%).
- Sysco turned more of its sales into free cash flow (2.3% FCF margin, against 1.5%).
- Sysco earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (16.8%, against 5.7%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Performance Food Group
PFGC
2/11
Revenue growth5-year growth
Sysco
SYY
9/11
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | PFGC FY26 | SYY FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $15.0B | $39.5B |
| Revenue | $67.8B | $84.6B |
| Free cash flow | $1.0B | $1.9B |
| Net income | $359M | $1.8B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 7.2% | 3.9% |
| 5-year growth | 17.4% | 10.5% |
| Share count change | 0.4% | −1.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.9% | 18.5% |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 3.7% |
| Net margin | 0.5% | 2.1% |
| FCF margin | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| Return on capital | 5.7% | 16.8% |
| Return on equity | 7.7% | 78.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $6.7B | $11.7B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.0x | 2.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.5M | $1.2B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.