Apollo Global Management
APO · Asset Management & Custody Banks
$112.83
1.7%KKR
KKR · Asset Management & Custody Banks
$91.34
1.9%The short version
- Apollo Global Management is the larger business, with $32.0B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $19.5B for KKR, about 1.6 times as much.
- Apollo Global Management grew revenue faster (22.7%, against −11.0%).
| Latest fiscal year | APO · FY25 | KKR · FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $68.8B | — |
| Revenue | $32.0B | $19.5B |
| Free cash flow | — | — |
| Net income | $3.5B | $2.4B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 22.7% | −11.0% |
| 5-year growth | 68.6% | 35.7% |
| Share count change | −1.7% | — |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | — | — |
| Net margin | 10.9% | 12.2% |
| FCF margin | — | — |
| Return on capital | — | — |
| Return on equity | — | 8.7% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$7.2B | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.8x | — |
| Dividends and buybacks | $2.0B | $653M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 41.3x | — |
| Piotroski F-score | — | — |
FY16
APO —
KKR $2.0B
FY17
APO —
KKR $3.6B
FY18
APO —
KKR $2.4B
FY19
APO —
KKR $4.2B
FY20
APO $2.4B
KKR $4.2B
FY21
APO $6.0B
KKR $16.2B
FY22
APO $11.0B
KKR $5.7B
FY23
APO $32.6B
KKR $14.5B
FY24
APO $26.1B
KKR $21.9B
FY25
APO $32.0B
KKR $19.5B
APO
KKR
FY16
APO —
KKR —
FY17
APO —
KKR —
FY18
APO —
KKR —
FY19
APO —
KKR —
FY20
APO —
KKR —
FY21
APO —
KKR —
FY22
APO —
KKR —
FY23
APO —
KKR —
FY24
APO —
KKR —
FY25
APO —
KKR —
APO
KKR
FY16
APO —
KKR −$1.5B
FY17
APO —
KKR −$3.6B
FY18
APO —
KKR −$7.7B
FY19
APO —
KKR −$5.9B
FY20
APO —
KKR —
FY21
APO —
KKR —
FY22
APO —
KKR —
FY23
APO —
KKR —
FY24
APO —
KKR —
FY25
APO —
KKR —
APO
KKR
FY16
APO —
KKR 3.5%
FY17
APO —
KKR 9.2%
FY18
APO —
KKR 7.4%
FY19
APO —
KKR 11.1%
FY20
APO —
KKR 9.6%
FY21
APO —
KKR 17.5%
FY22
APO —
KKR —
FY23
APO —
KKR —
FY24
APO —
KKR —
FY25
APO —
KKR —
APO
KKR
Add another company
Compare up to four at once.
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.