Ares Management
ARES · Asset Management & Custody Banks
$122.08
1.3%Brookfield Asset Management
BAM · Asset Management & Custody Banks
$47.03
1.3%The short version
- Brookfield Asset Management is the larger business, with $4.8B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $4.8B for Ares Management.
- Ares Management grew revenue faster (28.9%, against 21.0%).
| Latest fiscal year | ARES · FY25 | BAM · FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | — | — |
| Revenue | $4.8B | $4.8B |
| Free cash flow | — | $2.1B |
| Net income | $527M | $2.4B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 28.9% | 21.0% |
| 5-year growth | 22.1% | — |
| Share count change | — | — |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | — | — |
| Net margin | 11.1% | 49.8% |
| FCF margin | — | 43.4% |
| Return on capital | — | — |
| Return on equity | 13.5% | 39.4% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | — | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA | — | — |
| Dividends and buybacks | $0.0M | $3.2B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | — | — |
FY16
ARES $965M
BAM —
FY17
ARES $1.1B
BAM —
FY18
ARES $1.2B
BAM —
FY19
ARES $1.4B
BAM —
FY20
ARES $1.8B
BAM —
FY21
ARES $2.3B
BAM —
FY22
ARES $2.9B
BAM —
FY23
ARES $3.2B
BAM $4.1B
FY24
ARES $3.7B
BAM $4.0B
FY25
ARES $4.8B
BAM $4.8B
ARES
BAM
FY16
ARES —
BAM —
FY17
ARES —
BAM —
FY18
ARES —
BAM —
FY19
ARES —
BAM —
FY20
ARES —
BAM —
FY21
ARES —
BAM —
FY22
ARES —
BAM —
FY23
ARES —
BAM —
FY24
ARES —
BAM —
FY25
ARES —
BAM —
ARES
BAM
FY16
ARES −$638M
BAM —
FY17
ARES −$1.9B
BAM —
FY18
ARES −$1.4B
BAM —
FY19
ARES −$2.1B
BAM —
FY20
ARES —
BAM —
FY21
ARES —
BAM —
FY22
ARES —
BAM —
FY23
ARES —
BAM $1.4B
FY24
ARES —
BAM $1.6B
FY25
ARES —
BAM $2.1B
ARES
BAM
FY16
ARES —
BAM —
FY17
ARES —
BAM —
FY18
ARES —
BAM —
FY19
ARES —
BAM —
FY20
ARES —
BAM —
FY21
ARES —
BAM —
FY22
ARES —
BAM —
FY23
ARES —
BAM —
FY24
ARES —
BAM —
FY25
ARES —
BAM —
ARES
BAM
Add another company
Compare up to four at once.
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.