Equifax vs FTI Consulting
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Equifax and FTI Consulting side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Equifax is the larger business, with $6.1B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.8B for FTI Consulting, about 1.6 times as much.
- Equifax grew revenue faster (6.9%, against 2.4%).
- Equifax kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (18.0% operating margin, against 10.3%).
- Equifax turned more of its sales into free cash flow (18.7% FCF margin, against 2.5%).
- FTI Consulting earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (16.6%, against 8.5%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Equifax’s earnings: a P/E of 28.4x against 19.1x for FTI Consulting.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Equifax
EFX
6/10
Revenue growthOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
FTI Consulting
FCN
4/10
5-year growthReturn on capitalNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | EFX FY25 | FCN FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $20.8B | $4.6B |
| Revenue | $6.1B | $3.8B |
| Free cash flow | $1.1B | $93.6M |
| Net income | $660M | $271M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 6.9% | 2.4% |
| 5-year growth | 8.0% | 9.0% |
| Share count change | −0.6% | −8.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | 32.1% |
| Operating margin | 18.0% | 10.3% |
| Net margin | 10.9% | 7.2% |
| FCF margin | 18.7% | 2.5% |
| Return on capital | 8.5% | 16.6% |
| Return on equity | 14.1% | 13.6% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $4.9B | $99.9M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.7x | 0.2x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.2B | $859M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 28.4x | 19.1x |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 4 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

