Skip to content
stoqly
en

Languages

Figures come from SEC filings, which are in English. Company and industry names stay as filed.

$ USD

Popular

All currencies

Data is in US dollars, converted at the ECB reference rate of Oct 26, 2026.

Archer Daniels Midland vs Ingredion

Add, change or remove companies; up to four.

KIRA’s take AI analyst

I put Archer Daniels Midland and Ingredion side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:

Who comes out ahead

Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.

Archer Daniels Midland

ADM

1/10

5-year growth

Ingredion

INGR

9/10

Revenue growthGross marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change

Side by side

Best in the row

Latest fiscal year ADM FY25 INGR FY25
Size
Market cap $38.3B $6.1B
Revenue $80.3B $7.2B
Free cash flow $4.2B $511M
Net income $1.1B $729M
Growth
Revenue growth −6.2% −2.8%
5-year growth 4.5% 3.8%
Share count change −1.8% −2.1%
Profitability
Gross margin 6.3% 25.3%
Operating margin — 14.1%
Net margin 1.3% 10.1%
FCF margin 5.2% 7.1%
Return on capital 5.2% 16.0%
Return on equity 4.8% 18.1%
Balance sheet
Net debt $7.4B $709M
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 0.6x
Dividends and buybacks $987M $211M
Valuation & quality
P/E 21.6x 10.4x
Piotroski F-score 5 8

Ten years

Revenue

ADM INGR

Operating margin

ADM INGR

Free cash flow

ADM INGR

Return on capital

ADM INGR

Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

↑ ↓ to move · ↵ to open