BWX Technologies vs Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put BWX Technologies and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- BWX Technologies is the larger business, with $3.2B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.3B for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, about 2.4 times as much.
- BWX Technologies kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (12.7% operating margin, against 1.9%).
- BWX Technologies turned more of its sales into free cash flow (9.2% FCF margin, against −10.2%).
- BWX Technologies earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (13.9%, against 1.2%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
BWX Technologies
BWXT
8/11
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreShare count change
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
KTOS
3/11
Revenue growth5-year growthNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | BWXT FY25 | KTOS FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $12.1B | $7.4B |
| Revenue | $3.2B | $1.3B |
| Free cash flow | $295M | −$137M |
| Net income | $329M | $22.0M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 18.3% | 18.5% |
| 5-year growth | 8.5% | 12.5% |
| Share count change | 0.0% | 9.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.9% | 22.9% |
| Operating margin | 12.7% | 1.9% |
| Net margin | 10.3% | 1.6% |
| FCF margin | 9.2% | −10.2% |
| Return on capital | 13.9% | 1.2% |
| Return on equity | 28.4% | 1.3% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.5B | −$461M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.0x | −6.4x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $123M | $0.0M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 34.0x | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 4 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.