Skip to content
stoqly
en · USD

Appearance

Language

Currency

Popular

All currencies

Data is in US dollars, converted at the ECB reference rate of Oct 26, 2026.

Sign in

Coca-Cola Consolidated vs Monster Beverage

Add, change or remove companies; up to four.

KIRA’s take AI analyst

I put Coca-Cola Consolidated and Monster Beverage side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:

Who comes out ahead

Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.

Coca-Cola Consolidated

COKE

2/9

Return on capitalReturn on equity

Monster Beverage

MNST

7/9

Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginNet debt / EBITDA

Side by side

Best in the row

Latest fiscal year COKE FY25 MNST FY25
Size
Market cap — $45.9B
Revenue $7.2B $8.3B
Free cash flow $620M $2.0B
Net income $571M $1.9B
Growth
Revenue growth 4.8% 10.7%
5-year growth 7.6% 12.5%
Share count change — −2.8%
Profitability
Gross margin 39.7% 55.9%
Operating margin 13.2% 29.2%
Net margin 7.9% 23.0%
FCF margin 8.6% 23.7%
Return on capital 39.7% 36.1%
Return on equity 168.3% 26.8%
Balance sheet
Net debt $2.5B −$2.8B
Net debt / EBITDA 2.2x −1.1x
Dividends and buybacks $2.7B $104M
Valuation & quality
P/E — 21.5x
Piotroski F-score — 9

Ten years

Revenue

COKE MNST

Operating margin

COKE MNST

Free cash flow

COKE MNST

Return on capital

COKE MNST

Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

↑ ↓ to move · ↵ to open