EOG Resources vs Woodside Energy
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRAβs take AI analyst
I put EOG Resources and Woodside Energy side by side, using each oneβs latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- EOG Resources is the larger business, with $22.6B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $13.0B for Woodside Energy, about 1.7 times as much.
- Woodside Energy grew revenue faster (β1.5%, against β4.5%).
- Woodside Energy kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (30.0% operating margin, against 28.2%).
- EOG Resources earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (16.2%, against 7.1%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
EOG Resources
EOG
5/9
Net marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Woodside Energy
WDS
3/9
Revenue growth5-year growthOperating margin
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | EOG FY25 | WDS FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $86.6B | $44.6B |
| Revenue | $22.6B | $13.0B |
| Free cash flow | β | β |
| Net income | $5.0B | $2.7B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | β4.5% | β1.5% |
| 5-year growth | 15.5% | 29.3% |
| Share count change | β4.0% | 0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | β | 34.9% |
| Operating margin | 28.2% | 30.0% |
| Net margin | 22.0% | 20.9% |
| FCF margin | β | β |
| Return on capital | 16.2% | 7.1% |
| Return on equity | 16.8% | 7.6% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $4.7B | $6.3B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.4x | 0.7x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $4.7B | $2.1B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 12.7x | β |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.