Equitable vs Fidelity National Information Services
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRAβs take AI analyst
I put Equitable and Fidelity National Information Services side by side, using each oneβs latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Equitable is the larger business, with $11.7B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $10.7B for Fidelity National Information Services.
- Fidelity National Information Services grew revenue faster (5.4%, against β6.1%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 4 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Equitable
EQH
2/4
5-year growthShare count change
Fidelity National Information Services
FIS
2/4
Revenue growthNet margin
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | EQH FY25 | FIS FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $15.2B | $18.4B |
| Revenue | $11.7B | $10.7B |
| Free cash flow | β | $2.5B |
| Net income | β$1.4B | $382M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | β6.1% | 5.4% |
| 5-year growth | β1.2% | β3.2% |
| Share count change | β8.2% | β5.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | β | 36.9% |
| Operating margin | β | 16.3% |
| Net margin | β11.8% | 3.6% |
| FCF margin | β | 23.0% |
| Return on capital | β | 5.1% |
| Return on equity | β | 2.6% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | β$8.6B | $12.5B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | β | 3.4x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | β | 5.5x |
| Piotroski F-score | β | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.