G-III Apparel Group vs Kontoor Brands
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put G-III Apparel Group and Kontoor Brands side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Kontoor Brands is the larger business, with $3.2B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.0B for G-III Apparel Group.
- Kontoor Brands grew revenue faster (20.9%, against −7.0%).
- Kontoor Brands kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (10.7% operating margin, against 3.7%).
- Kontoor Brands turned more of its sales into free cash flow (13.8% FCF margin, against 8.9%).
- Kontoor Brands earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (21.2%, against 4.6%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Kontoor Brands’s earnings: a P/E of 15.8x against 9.6x for G-III Apparel Group.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
G-III Apparel Group
GIII
2/11
Net debt / EBITDAShare count change
Kontoor Brands
KTB
8/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equity
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | GIII FY25 | KTB FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $1.3B | $4.2B |
| Revenue | $3.0B | $3.2B |
| Free cash flow | $264M | $435M |
| Net income | $67.4M | $228M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | −7.0% | 20.9% |
| 5-year growth | 7.6% | 8.5% |
| Share count change | −3.5% | −0.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.4% | 45.2% |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 10.7% |
| Net margin | 2.3% | 7.2% |
| FCF margin | 8.9% | 13.8% |
| Return on capital | 4.6% | 21.2% |
| Return on equity | 3.9% | 47.1% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$402M | $1.0B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.9x | 2.7x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $54.0M | $141M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 9.6x | 15.8x |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.