KLA vs MKS Instruments
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put KLA and MKS Instruments side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- KLA is the larger business, with $13.6B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $3.9B for MKS Instruments, about 3.5 times as much.
- KLA grew revenue faster (11.7%, against 9.6%).
- KLA turned more of its sales into free cash flow (27.7% FCF margin, against 12.6%).
- KLA earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (75.3%, against 7.9%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
KLA
KLAC
10/10
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
MKS Instruments
MKSI
0/10
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | KLAC FY26 | MKSI FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $196.9B | $14.7B |
| Revenue | $13.6B | $3.9B |
| Free cash flow | $3.8B | $497M |
| Net income | $4.8B | $295M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 11.7% | 9.6% |
| 5-year growth | 14.4% | 11.0% |
| Share count change | −1.3% | 0.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.3% | 46.7% |
| Operating margin | — | 13.4% |
| Net margin | 35.6% | 7.5% |
| FCF margin | 27.7% | 12.6% |
| Return on capital | 75.3% | 7.9% |
| Return on equity | 87.5% | 11.7% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.0B | $3.9B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.2x | 4.4x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $3.3B | $104M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 32.2x |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

