M/I Homes vs NVR
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRAβs take AI analyst
I put M/I Homes and NVR side by side, using each oneβs latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- NVR is the larger business, with $10.3B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $4.4B for M/I Homes, about 2.3 times as much.
- NVR turned more of its sales into free cash flow (10.6% FCF margin, against 2.9%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of NVRβs earnings: a P/E of 14.9x against 11.8x for M/I Homes.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 6 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
M/I Homes
MHO
1/6
5-year growth
NVR
NVR
5/6
Revenue growthNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | MHO FY25 | NVR FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $16.0B |
| Revenue | $4.4B | $10.3B |
| Free cash flow | $128M | $1.1B |
| Net income | $403M | $1.3B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | β1.9% | β1.9% |
| 5-year growth | 7.7% | 6.5% |
| Share count change | β4.4% | β7.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.0% | β |
| Operating margin | 11.5% | β |
| Net margin | 9.1% | 13.0% |
| FCF margin | 2.9% | 10.6% |
| Return on capital | β | β |
| Return on equity | 13.2% | 33.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | β | β |
| Net debt / EBITDA | β | β |
| Dividends and buybacks | $202M | $1.8B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 11.8x | 14.9x |
| Piotroski F-score | β | β |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

