ServiceNow vs Twilio
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put ServiceNow and Twilio side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- ServiceNow is the larger business, with $13.3B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $5.1B for Twilio, about 2.6 times as much.
- ServiceNow grew revenue faster (20.9%, against 13.7%).
- ServiceNow kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (13.7% operating margin, against 3.1%).
- ServiceNow turned more of its sales into free cash flow (34.5% FCF margin, against 19.7%).
- ServiceNow earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (20.9%, against 1.5%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of ServiceNow’s earnings: a P/E of 98.9x against 36.7x for Twilio.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
ServiceNow
NOW
8/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equity
Twilio
TWLO
2/11
Net debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | NOW FY25 | TWLO FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $163.6B | $42.1B |
| Revenue | $13.3B | $5.1B |
| Free cash flow | $4.6B | $997M |
| Net income | $1.7B | $33.8M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 20.9% | 13.7% |
| 5-year growth | 24.1% | 23.5% |
| Share count change | 0.4% | −3.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 77.5% | 48.9% |
| Operating margin | 13.7% | 3.1% |
| Net margin | 13.2% | 0.7% |
| FCF margin | 34.5% | 19.7% |
| Return on capital | 20.9% | 1.5% |
| Return on equity | 15.5% | 0.4% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$4.8B | −$1.5B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.9x | −4.2x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.8B | $869M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 98.9x | 36.7x |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

