Oshkosh vs Terex
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Oshkosh and Terex side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Oshkosh is the larger business, with $10.4B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $5.4B for Terex, about 1.9 times as much.
- Terex grew revenue faster (5.7%, against −2.9%).
- Oshkosh earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (14.8%, against 9.0%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Oshkosh
OSK
6/11
Operating marginNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Terex
TEX
5/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginFCF marginPiotroski F-score
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | OSK FY25 | TEX FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $8.4B | $5.8B |
| Revenue | $10.4B | $5.4B |
| Free cash flow | $618M | $322M |
| Net income | $647M | $221M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | −2.9% | 5.7% |
| 5-year growth | 8.7% | 12.0% |
| Share count change | −1.9% | −1.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.5% | 19.4% |
| Operating margin | 9.0% | 8.8% |
| Net margin | 6.2% | 4.1% |
| FCF margin | 5.9% | 5.9% |
| Return on capital | 14.8% | 9.0% |
| Return on equity | 14.9% | 11.3% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $692M | $1.8B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.6x | 2.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $408M | $101M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 14.8x | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.