Tesla vs Winnebago Industries
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Tesla and Winnebago Industries side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Tesla is the larger business, with $94.8B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $2.7B for Winnebago Industries, about 35 times as much.
- Tesla kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (4.6% operating margin, against 2.5%).
- Tesla turned more of its sales into free cash flow (6.6% FCF margin, against 5.4%).
- Tesla earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (7.2%, against 3.3%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Tesla
TSLA
9/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDA
Winnebago Industries
WGO
2/11
Piotroski F-scoreShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | TSLA FY25 | WGO FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $1.39T | $798M |
| Revenue | $94.8B | $2.7B |
| Free cash flow | $6.2B | $145M |
| Net income | $3.8B | $34.5M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | −2.9% | −3.4% |
| 5-year growth | 24.6% | −5.7% |
| Share count change | 0.9% | 0.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.0% | 13.0% |
| Operating margin | 4.6% | 2.5% |
| Net margin | 4.0% | 1.3% |
| FCF margin | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Return on capital | 7.2% | 3.3% |
| Return on equity | 4.9% | 2.8% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$37.3B | $268M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −4.0x | 2.1x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $0.0M | $41.6M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.