Caesars Entertainment vs Flutter Entertainment
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Caesars Entertainment and Flutter Entertainment side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Flutter Entertainment is the larger business, with $16.4B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $11.5B for Caesars Entertainment.
- Flutter Entertainment grew revenue faster (16.6%, against 2.1%).
- Caesars Entertainment kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (16.2% operating margin, against 0.2%).
- Flutter Entertainment turned more of its sales into free cash flow (6.6% FCF margin, against 4.3%).
- Caesars Entertainment earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (9.6%, against 0.2%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Caesars Entertainment
CZR
5/10
Operating marginReturn on capitalPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Flutter Entertainment
FLUT
5/10
Revenue growth5-year growthNet marginFCF marginReturn on equity
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CZR FY25 | FLUT FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $5.9B | $14.0B |
| Revenue | $11.5B | $16.4B |
| Free cash flow | $497M | $1.1B |
| Net income | −$502M | −$310M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 2.1% | 16.6% |
| 5-year growth | 25.9% | 51.9% |
| Share count change | −3.3% | −1.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | 45.2% |
| Operating margin | 16.2% | 0.2% |
| Net margin | −4.4% | −1.9% |
| FCF margin | 4.3% | 6.6% |
| Return on capital | 9.6% | 0.2% |
| Return on equity | −13.1% | −3.4% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $11.2B | $10.4B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.4x | 6.7x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $229M | $1.1B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.