FTI Consulting vs Verisk Analytics
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
The short version
- FTI Consulting is the larger business, with $3.8B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.1B for Verisk Analytics.
- Verisk Analytics grew revenue faster (6.6%, against 2.4%).
- Verisk Analytics kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (43.7% operating margin, against 10.3%).
- Verisk Analytics turned more of its sales into free cash flow (38.8% FCF margin, against 2.5%).
- Verisk Analytics earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (35.5%, against 16.6%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Verisk Analytics’s earnings: a P/E of 29.8x against 18.9x for FTI Consulting.
| Latest fiscal year | FCN · FY25 | VRSK · FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $4.6B | $26.5B |
| Revenue | $3.8B | $3.1B |
| Free cash flow | $93.6M | $1.2B |
| Net income | $271M | $908M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 2.4% | 6.6% |
| 5-year growth | 9.0% | 6.3% |
| Share count change | −8.3% | −1.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% | 69.9% |
| Operating margin | 10.3% | 43.7% |
| Net margin | 7.2% | 29.6% |
| FCF margin | 2.5% | 38.8% |
| Return on capital | 16.6% | 35.5% |
| Return on equity | 13.6% | — |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $99.9M | $2.6B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.2x | 1.6x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $859M | $875M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 18.9x | 29.8x |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 |
Revenue
FY16
FCN $1.8B
VRSK $2.0B
FY17
FCN $1.8B
VRSK $2.1B
FY18
FCN $2.0B
VRSK $2.4B
FY19
FCN $2.4B
VRSK $2.6B
FY20
FCN $2.5B
VRSK $2.3B
FY21
FCN $2.8B
VRSK $2.5B
FY22
FCN $3.0B
VRSK $2.5B
FY23
FCN $3.5B
VRSK $2.7B
FY24
FCN $3.7B
VRSK $2.9B
FY25
FCN $3.8B
VRSK $3.1B
FCN
VRSK
Operating margin
FY16
FCN 7.9%
VRSK 38.5%
FY17
FCN 6.0%
VRSK 37.4%
FY18
FCN 11.1%
VRSK 34.8%
FY19
FCN 13.0%
VRSK 26.7%
FY20
FCN 11.5%
VRSK 42.1%
FY21
FCN 11.2%
VRSK 37.0%
FY22
FCN 10.0%
VRSK 56.3%
FY23
FCN 10.8%
VRSK 42.2%
FY24
FCN 9.4%
VRSK 43.5%
FY25
FCN 10.3%
VRSK 43.7%
FCN
VRSK
Free cash flow
FY16
FCN $205M
VRSK $421M
FY17
FCN $116M
VRSK $560M
FY18
FCN $198M
VRSK $703M
FY19
FCN $176M
VRSK $740M
FY20
FCN $292M
VRSK $821M
FY21
FCN $287M
VRSK $887M
FY22
FCN $135M
VRSK $784M
FY23
FCN $175M
VRSK $831M
FY24
FCN $360M
VRSK $920M
FY25
FCN $93.6M
VRSK $1.2B
FCN
VRSK
Return on capital
FY16
FCN 6.7%
VRSK 13.2%
FY17
FCN 7.9%
VRSK 15.3%
FY18
FCN 12.1%
VRSK 14.6%
FY19
FCN 17.0%
VRSK 11.1%
FY20
FCN 16.3%
VRSK 13.9%
FY21
FCN 17.7%
VRSK 11.9%
FY22
FCN 16.6%
VRSK 20.2%
FY23
FCN 18.3%
VRSK 20.3%
FY24
FCN 17.1%
VRSK 33.0%
FY25
FCN 16.6%
VRSK 35.5%
FCN
VRSK
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.