Lululemon Athletica vs Ralph Lauren
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Lululemon Athletica and Ralph Lauren side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Lululemon Athletica is the larger business, with $11.1B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $8.1B for Ralph Lauren.
- Ralph Lauren grew revenue faster (14.6%, against 4.9%).
- Lululemon Athletica kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (19.9% operating margin, against 14.5%).
- Ralph Lauren turned more of its sales into free cash flow (9.2% FCF margin, against 8.3%).
- Lululemon Athletica earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (56.8%, against 45.4%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Ralph Lauren’s earnings: a P/E of 24.4x against 8.5x for Lululemon Athletica.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Lululemon Athletica
LULU
6/11
5-year growthOperating marginNet marginReturn on capitalNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Ralph Lauren
RL
5/11
Revenue growthGross marginFCF marginReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | LULU FY25 | RL FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $11.6B | $23.7B |
| Revenue | $11.1B | $8.1B |
| Free cash flow | $922M | $746M |
| Net income | $1.6B | $941M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 4.9% | 14.6% |
| 5-year growth | 20.3% | 13.0% |
| Share count change | −3.9% | −2.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.6% | 69.9% |
| Operating margin | 19.9% | 14.5% |
| Net margin | 14.2% | 11.6% |
| FCF margin | 8.3% | 9.2% |
| Return on capital | 56.8% | 45.4% |
| Return on equity | 34.0% | 34.7% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$1.8B | −$593M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.7x | −0.4x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.2B | $840M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 8.5x | 24.4x |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

