MACOM Technology Solutions vs Synaptics
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put MACOM Technology Solutions and Synaptics side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Synaptics is the larger business, with $1.2B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $967M for MACOM Technology Solutions.
- MACOM Technology Solutions grew revenue faster (32.6%, against 11.4%).
- MACOM Technology Solutions kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (13.4% operating margin, against −5.6%).
- MACOM Technology Solutions turned more of its sales into free cash flow (19.9% FCF margin, against 8.5%).
- MACOM Technology Solutions earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (9.8%, against −3.4%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
MACOM Technology Solutions
MTSI
8/10
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equity
Synaptics
SYNA
1/10
Share count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | MTSI FY25 | SYNA FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $18.5B | $4.6B |
| Revenue | $967M | $1.2B |
| Free cash flow | $193M | $101M |
| Net income | −$54.2M | −$491M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 32.6% | 11.4% |
| 5-year growth | 12.8% | −2.2% |
| Share count change | 0.6% | −1.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 54.7% | 44.7% |
| Operating margin | 13.4% | −5.6% |
| Net margin | −5.6% | −41.0% |
| FCF margin | 19.9% | 8.5% |
| Return on capital | 9.8% | −3.4% |
| Return on equity | −4.4% | −42.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$254M | $395M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.3x | — |
| Dividends and buybacks | $43.1M | $92.7M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 75.2x | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.