Andersons vs Performance Food Group
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Andersons and Performance Food Group side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Performance Food Group is the larger business, with $67.8B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $11.0B for Andersons, about 6.2 times as much.
- Performance Food Group grew revenue faster (7.2%, against −2.2%).
- Performance Food Group turned more of its sales into free cash flow (1.5% FCF margin, against −0.5%).
- Andersons earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (9.3%, against 5.7%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Andersons
ANDE
4/10
Net marginReturn on capitalNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Performance Food Group
PFGC
5/10
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginFCF marginReturn on equity
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | ANDE FY25 | PFGC FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $2.2B | $15.0B |
| Revenue | $11.0B | $67.8B |
| Free cash flow | −$56.1M | $1.0B |
| Net income | $95.7M | $359M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | −2.2% | 7.2% |
| 5-year growth | 6.4% | 17.4% |
| Share count change | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.5% | 11.9% |
| Operating margin | — | 1.3% |
| Net margin | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| FCF margin | −0.5% | 1.5% |
| Return on capital | 9.3% | 5.7% |
| Return on equity | 7.3% | 7.7% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $471M | $6.7B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.5x | 4.0x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $42.2M | $1.5M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.