A. O. Smith vs Louisiana-Pacific
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put A. O. Smith and Louisiana-Pacific side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- A. O. Smith is the larger business, with $3.8B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $2.7B for Louisiana-Pacific.
- A. O. Smith grew revenue faster (0.3%, against −7.9%).
- A. O. Smith kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (19.0% operating margin, against 7.7%).
- A. O. Smith turned more of its sales into free cash flow (14.3% FCF margin, against 3.4%).
- A. O. Smith earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (30.7%, against 9.0%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Louisiana-Pacific’s earnings: a P/E of 92.3x against 17.2x for A. O. Smith.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
A. O. Smith
AOS
11/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Louisiana-Pacific
LPX
0/11
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | AOS FY25 | LPX FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $8.5B | $5.0B |
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.7B |
| Free cash flow | $546M | $91.0M |
| Net income | $546M | $146M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 0.3% | −7.9% |
| 5-year growth | 5.8% | 2.5% |
| Share count change | −3.5% | −1.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.8% | 21.8% |
| Operating margin | 19.0% | 7.7% |
| Net margin | 14.3% | 5.4% |
| FCF margin | 14.3% | 3.4% |
| Return on capital | 30.7% | 9.0% |
| Return on equity | 29.2% | 8.6% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$38.2M | $56.0M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.1x | 0.2x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $597M | $139M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 17.2x | 92.3x |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

