Aramark vs Goodyear Tire and Rubber
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Aramark and Goodyear Tire and Rubber side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Aramark is the larger business, with $18.5B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $18.3B for Goodyear Tire and Rubber.
- Aramark grew revenue faster (6.4%, against −3.2%).
- Aramark turned more of its sales into free cash flow (2.3% FCF margin, against −0.2%).
- Aramark earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (7.7%, against 2.4%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Aramark
ARMK
7/9
Revenue growthNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDA
Goodyear Tire and Rubber
GT
2/9
5-year growthShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | ARMK FY25 | GT FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $14.1B | $1.2B |
| Revenue | $18.5B | $18.3B |
| Free cash flow | $432M | −$30.0M |
| Net income | $326M | −$1.7B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 6.4% | −3.2% |
| 5-year growth | 7.6% | 8.2% |
| Share count change | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | 18.4% |
| Operating margin | 4.3% | — |
| Net margin | 1.8% | −9.4% |
| FCF margin | 2.3% | −0.2% |
| Return on capital | 7.7% | 2.4% |
| Return on equity | 10.6% | −43.5% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $4.8B | $5.4B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.8x | 4.0x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $281M | $0.0M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 37.0x | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.