Camping World vs PHINIA
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Camping World and PHINIA side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Camping World is the larger business, with $6.4B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.5B for PHINIA, about 1.8 times as much.
- Camping World grew revenue faster (4.4%, against 2.4%).
- PHINIA kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (7.3% operating margin, against 2.8%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 6 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Camping World
CWH
2/6
Revenue growthGross margin
PHINIA
PHIN
4/6
Operating marginNet marginReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CWH FY25 | PHIN FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | — | $2.2B |
| Revenue | $6.4B | $3.5B |
| Free cash flow | — | $188M |
| Net income | −$89.8M | $130M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 4.4% | 2.4% |
| 5-year growth | 3.2% | — |
| Share count change | — | −10.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.5% | 21.9% |
| Operating margin | 2.8% | 7.3% |
| Net margin | −1.4% | 3.7% |
| FCF margin | — | 5.4% |
| Return on capital | 4.9% | — |
| Return on equity | −32.4% | 8.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.4B | $617M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.1x | 1.5x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $31.4M | $42.0M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 16.4x |
| Piotroski F-score | — | — |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.