Everest Group vs MGIC Investment
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
The short version
- Everest Group is the larger business, with $17.5B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.2B for MGIC Investment, about 14 times as much.
- Everest Group grew revenue faster (1.2%, against 0.5%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of MGIC Investmentβs earnings: a P/E of 9.0x against 8.4x for Everest Group.
| Latest fiscal year | EG Β· FY25 | MTG Β· FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $15.5B | $6.1B |
| Revenue | $17.5B | $1.2B |
| Free cash flow | β | $852M |
| Net income | $1.6B | $738M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| 5-year growth | 12.8% | 0.2% |
| Share count change | β2.6% | β11.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | β | β |
| Operating margin | β | β |
| Net margin | 9.1% | 60.8% |
| FCF margin | β | 70.2% |
| Return on capital | β | β |
| Return on equity | 10.9% | 14.3% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | β | β |
| Net debt / EBITDA | β | β |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.1B | $921M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 8.4x | 9.0x |
| Piotroski F-score | β | β |
Revenue
FY16
EG $5.8B
MTG $1.1B
FY17
EG $6.6B
MTG $1.1B
FY18
EG $7.4B
MTG $1.1B
FY19
EG $8.2B
MTG $1.2B
FY20
EG $9.6B
MTG $1.2B
FY21
EG $11.9B
MTG $1.2B
FY22
EG $12.1B
MTG $1.2B
FY23
EG $14.6B
MTG $1.2B
FY24
EG $17.3B
MTG $1.2B
FY25
EG $17.5B
MTG $1.2B
EG
MTG
Operating margin
FY16
EG β
MTG β
FY17
EG β
MTG β
FY18
EG β
MTG β
FY19
EG β
MTG β
FY20
EG β
MTG β
FY21
EG β
MTG β
FY22
EG β
MTG β
FY23
EG β
MTG β
FY24
EG β
MTG β
FY25
EG β
MTG β
EG
MTG
Free cash flow
FY16
EG β
MTG $214M
FY17
EG β
MTG $391M
FY18
EG β
MTG $530M
FY19
EG β
MTG $604M
FY20
EG β
MTG $729M
FY21
EG β
MTG $692M
FY22
EG β
MTG $647M
FY23
EG β
MTG $711M
FY24
EG β
MTG $724M
FY25
EG β
MTG $852M
EG
MTG
Return on capital
FY16
EG β
MTG 11.1%
FY17
EG β
MTG 11.3%
FY18
EG β
MTG 17.5%
FY19
EG β
MTG 15.5%
FY20
EG β
MTG 9.3%
FY21
EG β
MTG 12.2%
FY22
EG β
MTG 16.9%
FY23
EG β
MTG 14.4%
FY24
EG β
MTG β
FY25
EG β
MTG β
EG
MTG
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.