HealthEquity vs Humana
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put HealthEquity and Humana side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Humana is the larger business, with $129.7B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.3B for HealthEquity, about 99 times as much.
- Humana grew revenue faster (10.1%, against 9.5%).
- HealthEquity kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (24.6% operating margin, against 2.1%).
- HealthEquity turned more of its sales into free cash flow (34.7% FCF margin, against 0.3%).
- Humana earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (25.7%, against 8.9%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Humana’s earnings: a P/E of 44.5x against 37.5x for HealthEquity.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
HealthEquity
HQY
7/10
5-year growthOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreShare count change
Humana
HUM
3/10
Revenue growthReturn on capitalNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | HQY FY26 | HUM FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $8.7B | $50.4B |
| Revenue | $1.3B | $129.7B |
| Free cash flow | $455M | $375M |
| Net income | $215M | $1.2B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 9.5% | 10.1% |
| 5-year growth | 12.4% | 10.9% |
| Share count change | −1.5% | −0.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.5% | — |
| Operating margin | 24.6% | 2.1% |
| Net margin | 16.4% | 0.9% |
| FCF margin | 34.7% | 0.3% |
| Return on capital | 8.9% | 25.7% |
| Return on equity | 10.2% | 7.0% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $639M | −$7.5B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.3x | −2.2x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $299M | $581M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 37.5x | 44.5x |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

