Skip to content
stoqly
en · USD

Appearance

Language

Currency

Popular

All currencies

Data is in US dollars, converted at the ECB reference rate of Oct 26, 2026.

Sign in

Philip Morris International vs Universal

Add, change or remove companies; up to four.

KIRA’s take AI analyst

I put Philip Morris International and Universal side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:

Who comes out ahead

Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.

Philip Morris International

PM

9/10

Revenue growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change

Universal

UVV

1/10

5-year growth

Side by side

Best in the row

Latest fiscal year PM FY25 UVV FY26
Size
Market cap $314.9B $978M
Revenue $40.6B $2.9B
Free cash flow $10.7B $80.3M
Net income $11.3B $32.6M
Growth
Revenue growth 7.3% −1.3%
5-year growth 7.2% 8.0%
Share count change 0.1% 0.2%
Profitability
Gross margin 67.1% 16.4%
Operating margin 36.6% 5.8%
Net margin 27.9% 1.1%
FCF margin 26.2% 2.8%
Return on capital 35.4% 4.0%
Return on equity — 2.3%
Balance sheet
Net debt $44.0B $842M
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x 3.8x
Dividends and buybacks $8.6B $81.3M
Valuation & quality
P/E 29.5x 51.3x
Piotroski F-score 7 5

Ten years

Revenue

PM UVV

Operating margin

PM UVV

Free cash flow

PM UVV

Return on capital

PM UVV

Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

↑ ↓ to move · ↵ to open