Amer Sports vs Ralph Lauren
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Amer Sports and Ralph Lauren side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Ralph Lauren is the larger business, with $8.1B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $6.6B for Amer Sports.
- Amer Sports grew revenue faster (26.7%, against 14.6%).
- Ralph Lauren kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (14.5% operating margin, against 10.7%).
- Ralph Lauren turned more of its sales into free cash flow (9.2% FCF margin, against 7.8%).
- Ralph Lauren earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (45.4%, against 8.5%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Amer Sports
AS
1/10
Revenue growth
Ralph Lauren
RL
9/10
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | AS FY25 | RL FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $15.9B | $24.0B |
| Revenue | $6.6B | $8.1B |
| Free cash flow | $513M | $746M |
| Net income | $427M | $941M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 26.7% | 14.6% |
| 5-year growth | — | 13.0% |
| Share count change | 12.2% | −2.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.6% | 69.9% |
| Operating margin | 10.7% | 14.5% |
| Net margin | 6.5% | 11.6% |
| FCF margin | 7.8% | 9.2% |
| Return on capital | 8.5% | 45.4% |
| Return on equity | 7.9% | 34.7% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $283M | −$593M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.3x | −0.4x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $0.0M | $840M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 24.7x |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

