L3Harris vs Northrop Grumman
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put L3Harris and Northrop Grumman side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Northrop Grumman is the larger business, with $42.0B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $21.9B for L3Harris, about 1.9 times as much.
- Northrop Grumman kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (10.8% operating margin, against 9.7%).
- L3Harris turned more of its sales into free cash flow (12.3% FCF margin, against 7.9%).
- Northrop Grumman earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (13.5%, against 5.8%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of L3Harris’s earnings: a P/E of 26.2x against 17.9x for Northrop Grumman.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
L3Harris
LHX
4/10
Revenue growth5-year growthFCF marginPiotroski F-score
Northrop Grumman
NOC
6/10
Operating marginNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | LHX FY25 | NOC FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $48.7B | $80.5B |
| Revenue | $21.9B | $42.0B |
| Free cash flow | $2.7B | $3.3B |
| Net income | $1.6B | $4.2B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| 5-year growth | 3.7% | 2.7% |
| Share count change | −1.2% | −2.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.7% | — |
| Operating margin | 9.7% | 10.8% |
| Net margin | 7.4% | 10.0% |
| FCF margin | 12.3% | 7.9% |
| Return on capital | 5.8% | 13.5% |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | 26.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $10.0B | $11.3B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.0x | 1.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $2.1B | $2.9B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 26.2x | 17.9x |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

