L3Harris vs Textron
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put L3Harris and Textron side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- L3Harris is the larger business, with $21.9B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $14.8B for Textron.
- Textron grew revenue faster (8.0%, against 2.5%).
- L3Harris turned more of its sales into free cash flow (12.3% FCF margin, against 6.3%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of L3Harris’s earnings: a P/E of 26.2x against 14.7x for Textron.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 6 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
L3Harris
LHX
2/6
Net marginFCF margin
Textron
TXT
4/6
Revenue growth5-year growthReturn on equityShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | LHX FY25 | TXT FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $48.7B | $13.7B |
| Revenue | $21.9B | $14.8B |
| Free cash flow | $2.7B | $929M |
| Net income | $1.6B | $921M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 2.5% | 8.0% |
| 5-year growth | 3.7% | 4.9% |
| Share count change | −1.2% | −5.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.7% | — |
| Operating margin | 9.7% | — |
| Net margin | 7.4% | 6.2% |
| FCF margin | 12.3% | 6.3% |
| Return on capital | 5.8% | — |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | 12.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $10.0B | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.0x | — |
| Dividends and buybacks | $2.1B | $840M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 26.2x | 14.7x |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | — |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

