Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality vs Sabre
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality and Sabre side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Sabre is the larger business, with $2.8B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $452M for Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality, about 6.1 times as much.
- Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality grew revenue faster (23.5%, against 1.0%).
- Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality turned more of its sales into free cash flow (2.5% FCF margin, against −6.9%).
- Sabre earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (8.9%, against 6.3%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality’s earnings: a P/E of 41.0x against 1.0x for Sabre.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality
PRSU
4/9
Revenue growthGross marginFCF marginNet debt / EBITDA
Sabre
SABR
4/9
5-year growthNet marginReturn on capitalShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | PRSU FY25 | SABR FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $655M |
| Revenue | $452M | $2.8B |
| Free cash flow | $11.1M | −$192M |
| Net income | $22.7M | $525M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 23.5% | 1.0% |
| 5-year growth | 1.7% | 15.7% |
| Share count change | 32.5% | 2.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 92.4% | 56.4% |
| Operating margin | — | 10.7% |
| Net margin | 5.0% | 18.9% |
| FCF margin | 2.5% | −6.9% |
| Return on capital | 6.3% | 8.9% |
| Return on equity | 4.1% | — |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $128M | $3.6B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.2x | 8.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $10.2M | $0.0M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 41.0x | 1.0x |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.