Restaurant Brands International vs Yum! Brands
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Restaurant Brands International and Yum! Brands side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Restaurant Brands International is the larger business, with $9.4B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $8.2B for Yum! Brands.
- Restaurant Brands International grew revenue faster (12.2%, against 8.8%).
- Yum! Brands kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (31.3% operating margin, against 23.3%).
- Yum! Brands turned more of its sales into free cash flow (20.0% FCF margin, against 15.4%).
- Yum! Brands earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (54.8%, against 9.0%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Restaurant Brands International’s earnings: a P/E of 20.0x against 18.8x for Yum! Brands.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Restaurant Brands International
QSR
2/9
Revenue growth5-year growth
Yum! Brands
YUM
6/9
Operating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | QSR FY25 | YUM FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $34.3B | $41.4B |
| Revenue | $9.4B | $8.2B |
| Free cash flow | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Net income | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 12.2% | 8.8% |
| 5-year growth | 13.7% | 7.8% |
| Share count change | 0.7% | −1.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | 69.8% |
| Operating margin | 23.3% | 31.3% |
| Net margin | 11.4% | 19.0% |
| FCF margin | 15.4% | 20.0% |
| Return on capital | 9.0% | 54.8% |
| Return on equity | 31.9% | — |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $12.4B | $11.3B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.0x | 4.1x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 20.0x | 18.8x |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.