Wolverine World Wide vs Yeti
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Wolverine World Wide and Yeti side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Wolverine World Wide is the larger business, with $1.9B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.9B for Yeti.
- Wolverine World Wide grew revenue faster (6.8%, against 2.1%).
- Yeti kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (11.4% operating margin, against 8.0%).
- Yeti turned more of its sales into free cash flow (11.4% FCF margin, against 6.7%).
- Yeti earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (32.1%, against 15.1%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Wolverine World Wide
WWW
3/11
Revenue growthReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
Yeti
YETI
8/11
5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | WWW FY25 | YETI FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $1.7B | $3.3B |
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.9B |
| Free cash flow | $126M | $212M |
| Net income | $95.8M | $165M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 6.8% | 2.1% |
| 5-year growth | 0.9% | 11.4% |
| Share count change | 2.1% | −4.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.3% | 57.4% |
| Operating margin | 8.0% | 11.4% |
| Net margin | 5.1% | 8.9% |
| FCF margin | 6.7% | 11.4% |
| Return on capital | 15.1% | 32.1% |
| Return on equity | 26.6% | 23.8% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $415M | −$113M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.4x | −0.4x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $47.8M | $298M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 15.7x | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.