Skip to content
stoqly
en · USD

Appearance

Language

Currency

Popular

All currencies

Data is in US dollars, converted at the ECB reference rate of Oct 26, 2026.

Sign in

Archer Daniels Midland vs Ingredion

Add, change or remove companies; up to four.

KIRA’s take AI analyst

I put Archer Daniels Midland and Ingredion side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:

Who comes out ahead

Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.

Archer Daniels Midland

ADM

1/10

5-year growth

Ingredion

INGR

9/10

Revenue growthGross marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change

Side by side

Best in the row

Latest fiscal year ADM FY25 INGR FY25
Size
Market cap $38.3B $6.1B
Revenue $80.3B $7.2B
Free cash flow $4.2B $511M
Net income $1.1B $729M
Growth
Revenue growth −6.2% −2.8%
5-year growth 4.5% 3.8%
Share count change −1.8% −2.1%
Profitability
Gross margin 6.3% 25.3%
Operating margin — 14.1%
Net margin 1.3% 10.1%
FCF margin 5.2% 7.1%
Return on capital 5.2% 16.0%
Return on equity 4.8% 18.1%
Balance sheet
Net debt $7.4B $709M
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 0.6x
Dividends and buybacks $987M $211M
Valuation & quality
P/E 21.6x 10.4x
Piotroski F-score 5 8

Ten years

Revenue

ADM INGR

Operating margin

ADM INGR

Free cash flow

ADM INGR

Return on capital

ADM INGR

Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

↑ ↓ to move · ↵ to open