American Water Works vs California Water Service Group
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put American Water Works and California Water Service Group side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- American Water Works is the larger business, with $5.1B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $964M for California Water Service Group, about 5.3 times as much.
- American Water Works grew revenue faster (9.7%, against 6.4%).
- American Water Works kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (36.6% operating margin, against 17.7%).
- American Water Works earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (5.8%, against 4.8%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of American Water Works’s earnings: a P/E of 24.6x against 21.6x for California Water Service Group.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
American Water Works
AWK
7/9
Revenue growthOperating marginNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreShare count change
California Water Service Group
CWT
2/9
5-year growthNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | AWK FY25 | CWT FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $27.8B | $2.9B |
| Revenue | $5.1B | $964M |
| Free cash flow | −$1.1B | — |
| Net income | $1.1B | $128M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 9.7% | 6.4% |
| 5-year growth | 6.4% | 6.7% |
| Share count change | 0.0% | 1.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | 36.6% | 17.7% |
| Net margin | 21.6% | 13.3% |
| FCF margin | −20.8% | — |
| Return on capital | 5.8% | 4.8% |
| Return on equity | 10.5% | 7.7% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $15.7B | $1.6B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.7x | 4.9x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $633M | $75.3M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 24.6x | 21.6x |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 4 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

