A. O. Smith vs Fortune Brands Innovations
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put A. O. Smith and Fortune Brands Innovations side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Fortune Brands Innovations is the larger business, with $4.5B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.8B for A. O. Smith.
- A. O. Smith grew revenue faster (0.3%, against −3.2%).
- A. O. Smith kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (19.0% operating margin, against 11.6%).
- A. O. Smith turned more of its sales into free cash flow (14.3% FCF margin, against 8.2%).
- A. O. Smith earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (30.7%, against 7.7%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Fortune Brands Innovations’s earnings: a P/E of 34.7x against 17.2x for A. O. Smith.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
A. O. Smith
AOS
9/11
Revenue growth5-year growthOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDA
Fortune Brands Innovations
FBIN
2/11
Gross marginShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | AOS FY25 | FBIN FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $8.5B | $5.1B |
| Revenue | $3.8B | $4.5B |
| Free cash flow | $546M | $367M |
| Net income | $546M | $299M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 0.3% | −3.2% |
| 5-year growth | 5.8% | 4.3% |
| Share count change | −3.5% | −3.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.8% | 44.6% |
| Operating margin | 19.0% | 11.6% |
| Net margin | 14.3% | 6.7% |
| FCF margin | 14.3% | 8.2% |
| Return on capital | 30.7% | 7.7% |
| Return on equity | 29.2% | 12.4% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$38.2M | $2.3B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.1x | 3.2x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $597M | $368M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 17.2x | 34.7x |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

