Casey's vs United Natural Foods
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Casey's and United Natural Foods side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- United Natural Foods is the larger business, with $31.2B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $17.6B for Casey's, about 1.8 times as much.
- Casey's grew revenue faster (10.2%, against −2.0%).
- Casey's turned more of its sales into free cash flow (4.1% FCF margin, against 1.0%).
- Casey's earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (13.6%, against 5.3%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Casey's
CASY
9/9
Revenue growth5-year growthNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
United Natural Foods
UNFI
0/9
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CASY FY26 | UNFI FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $26.1B | $3.0B |
| Revenue | $17.6B | $31.2B |
| Free cash flow | $722M | $323M |
| Net income | $714M | $84.0M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 10.2% | −2.0% |
| 5-year growth | 15.1% | 2.9% |
| Share count change | −0.2% | 4.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | 13.5% |
| Operating margin | — | 0.7% |
| Net margin | 4.1% | 0.3% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% | 1.0% |
| Return on capital | 13.6% | 5.3% |
| Return on equity | 19.2% | 5.3% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.3x | 3.0x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $284M | $50.0M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 33.9x | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 6 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

