Skip to content
stoqly
en

Languages

Figures come from SEC filings, which are in English. Company and industry names stay as filed.

$ USD

Popular

All currencies

Data is in US dollars, converted at the ECB reference rate of Oct 26, 2026.

Cadence Design Systems vs Zoom Communications

Add, change or remove companies; up to four.

KIRA’s take AI analyst

I put Cadence Design Systems and Zoom Communications side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:

Who comes out ahead

Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.

Cadence Design Systems

CDNS

4/10

Revenue growth5-year growthOperating marginReturn on equity

Zoom Communications

ZM

6/10

Net marginFCF marginReturn on capitalPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change

Side by side

Best in the row

Latest fiscal year CDNS FY25 ZM FY26
Size
Market cap $88.2B $29.4B
Revenue $5.3B $4.9B
Free cash flow $1.6B $1.9B
Net income $1.1B $1.9B
Growth
Revenue growth 14.1% 4.4%
5-year growth 14.6% 12.9%
Share count change −0.2% −2.5%
Profitability
Gross margin — 77.0%
Operating margin 28.2% 23.1%
Net margin 20.9% 39.0%
FCF margin 30.0% 39.5%
Return on capital 23.7% 56.2%
Return on equity 21.9% 20.3%
Balance sheet
Net debt −$675M −$7.8B
Net debt / EBITDA −0.4x −6.2x
Dividends and buybacks $925M $1.6B
Valuation & quality
P/E 75.1x 9.1x
Piotroski F-score 5 6

Ten years

Revenue

CDNS ZM

Operating margin

CDNS ZM

Free cash flow

CDNS ZM

Return on capital

CDNS ZM

Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

↑ ↓ to move · ↵ to open