Skip to content
stoqly
en · USD

Appearance

Language

Currency

Popular

All currencies

Data is in US dollars, converted at the ECB reference rate of Oct 26, 2026.

Sign in

Cadence Design Systems vs Zoom Communications

Add, change or remove companies; up to four.

KIRA’s take AI analyst

I put Cadence Design Systems and Zoom Communications side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:

Who comes out ahead

Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.

Cadence Design Systems

CDNS

4/10

Revenue growth5-year growthOperating marginReturn on equity

Zoom Communications

ZM

6/10

Net marginFCF marginReturn on capitalPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDAShare count change

Side by side

Best in the row

Latest fiscal year CDNS FY25 ZM FY26
Size
Market cap $88.2B $29.4B
Revenue $5.3B $4.9B
Free cash flow $1.6B $1.9B
Net income $1.1B $1.9B
Growth
Revenue growth 14.1% 4.4%
5-year growth 14.6% 12.9%
Share count change −0.2% −2.5%
Profitability
Gross margin — 77.0%
Operating margin 28.2% 23.1%
Net margin 20.9% 39.0%
FCF margin 30.0% 39.5%
Return on capital 23.7% 56.2%
Return on equity 21.9% 20.3%
Balance sheet
Net debt −$675M −$7.8B
Net debt / EBITDA −0.4x −6.2x
Dividends and buybacks $925M $1.6B
Valuation & quality
P/E 75.1x 9.1x
Piotroski F-score 5 6

Ten years

Revenue

CDNS ZM

Operating margin

CDNS ZM

Free cash flow

CDNS ZM

Return on capital

CDNS ZM

Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

↑ ↓ to move · ↵ to open