LivaNova vs Penumbra
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put LivaNova and Penumbra side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Penumbra is the larger business, with $1.4B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.4B for LivaNova.
- Penumbra grew revenue faster (17.5%, against 10.7%).
- LivaNova kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (14.4% operating margin, against 13.5%).
- Penumbra earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (18.8%, against 12.8%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Penumbra’s earnings: a P/E of 79.7x against 23.9x for LivaNova.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 10 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
LivaNova
LIVN
4/10
Gross marginOperating marginFCF marginShare count change
Penumbra
PEN
6/10
Revenue growth5-year growthNet marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | LIVN FY25 | PEN FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $4.6B | $12.8B |
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Free cash flow | $173M | $175M |
| Net income | −$243M | $178M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 10.7% | 17.5% |
| 5-year growth | 8.2% | 20.2% |
| Share count change | −0.1% | 0.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.7% | 67.1% |
| Operating margin | 14.4% | 13.5% |
| Net margin | −17.5% | 12.7% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% | 12.5% |
| Return on capital | 12.8% | 18.8% |
| Return on equity | −19.2% | 13.8% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | −$260M | −$522M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | — | −2.5x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $0.0M | $0.0M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 23.9x | 79.7x |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

