Albertsons vs Casey's
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Albertsons and Casey's side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Albertsons is the larger business, with $83.2B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $17.6B for Casey's, about 4.7 times as much.
- Casey's grew revenue faster (10.2%, against 3.5%).
- Casey's turned more of its sales into free cash flow (4.1% FCF margin, against 0.6%).
- Casey's earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (13.6%, against 5.5%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Albertsons
ACI
1/9
Share count change
Casey's
CASY
8/9
Revenue growth5-year growthNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | ACI FY25 | CASY FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $6.8B | $26.1B |
| Revenue | $83.2B | $17.6B |
| Free cash flow | $527M | $722M |
| Net income | $217M | $714M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 3.5% | 10.2% |
| 5-year growth | 3.6% | 15.1% |
| Share count change | −6.3% | −0.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.2% | — |
| Operating margin | 0.9% | — |
| Net margin | 0.3% | 4.1% |
| FCF margin | 0.6% | 4.1% |
| Return on capital | 5.5% | 13.6% |
| Return on equity | 8.3% | 19.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $8.7B | $1.9B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.3x | 1.3x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.8B | $284M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 33.9x |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.