ADT vs H&R Block
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put ADT and H&R Block side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- ADT is the larger business, with $5.1B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.9B for H&R Block.
- ADT turned more of its sales into free cash flow (33.3% FCF margin, against 19.2%).
- H&R Block earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (129.0%, against 8.2%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 6 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
ADT
ADT
1/6
FCF margin
H&R Block
HRB
5/6
Revenue growth5-year growthNet marginReturn on capitalNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | ADT FY25 | HRB FY26 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | — | $6.5B |
| Revenue | $5.1B | $3.9B |
| Free cash flow | $1.7B | $756M |
| Net income | $596M | $734M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| 5-year growth | −0.7% | 2.9% |
| Share count change | — | −6.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | — | 44.3% |
| Operating margin | 25.5% | — |
| Net margin | 11.6% | 18.6% |
| FCF margin | 33.3% | 19.2% |
| Return on capital | 8.2% | 129.0% |
| Return on equity | 15.7% | — |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $7.8B | $533M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.9x | 0.5x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $794M | $211M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | — | 8 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

