AutoZone vs Group 1 Automotive
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put AutoZone and Group 1 Automotive side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Group 1 Automotive is the larger business, with $22.6B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $18.9B for AutoZone.
- Group 1 Automotive grew revenue faster (13.2%, against 2.4%).
- AutoZone kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (19.1% operating margin, against 3.3%).
- AutoZone turned more of its sales into free cash flow (9.5% FCF margin, against 1.9%).
- AutoZone earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (58.2%, against 8.6%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of AutoZone’s earnings: a P/E of 21.9x against 10.1x for Group 1 Automotive.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
AutoZone
AZO
6/9
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalPiotroski F-score
Group 1 Automotive
GPI
3/9
Revenue growth5-year growthShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | AZO FY25 | GPI FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $53.9B | $2.9B |
| Revenue | $18.9B | $22.6B |
| Free cash flow | $1.8B | $425M |
| Net income | $2.5B | $325M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 2.4% | 13.2% |
| 5-year growth | 8.4% | 16.3% |
| Share count change | −3.1% | −3.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.6% | 16.1% |
| Operating margin | 19.1% | 3.3% |
| Net margin | 13.2% | 1.4% |
| FCF margin | 9.5% | 1.9% |
| Return on capital | 58.2% | 8.6% |
| Return on equity | — | 11.3% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $8.9B | $3.7B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.1x | — |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.6B | $580M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 21.9x | 10.1x |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.