Broadridge Financial Solutions vs Genpact
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Broadridge Financial Solutions and Genpact side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Broadridge Financial Solutions is the larger business, with $7.5B of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $5.1B for Genpact.
- Broadridge Financial Solutions grew revenue faster (8.5%, against 6.6%).
- Broadridge Financial Solutions kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (17.4% operating margin, against 14.8%).
- Broadridge Financial Solutions turned more of its sales into free cash flow (17.1% FCF margin, against 14.5%).
- Genpact earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (19.4%, against 18.3%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Broadridge Financial Solutions
BR
7/11
Revenue growth5-year growthOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on equityPiotroski F-score
Genpact
G
4/11
Gross marginReturn on capitalNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | BR FY26 | G FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $21.2B | $6.9B |
| Revenue | $7.5B | $5.1B |
| Free cash flow | $1.3B | $735M |
| Net income | $1.1B | $553M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 8.5% | 6.6% |
| 5-year growth | 8.4% | 6.5% |
| Share count change | −1.0% | −2.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.8% | 36.0% |
| Operating margin | 17.4% | 14.8% |
| Net margin | 15.0% | 10.9% |
| FCF margin | 17.1% | 14.5% |
| Return on capital | 18.3% | 19.4% |
| Return on equity | 40.9% | 22.4% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $2.9B | $358M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.0x | 0.4x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.0B | $118M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | — | 12.0x |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 | 7 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.