Caterpillar vs Cummins
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Caterpillar and Cummins side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Caterpillar is the larger business, with $67.6B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $33.7B for Cummins, about 2.0 times as much.
- Caterpillar grew revenue faster (4.3%, against −1.3%).
- Caterpillar kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (16.5% operating margin, against 12.0%).
- Caterpillar turned more of its sales into free cash flow (13.2% FCF margin, against 7.1%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Caterpillar’s earnings: a P/E of 29.8x against 26.7x for Cummins.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Caterpillar
CAT
8/11
Revenue growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityShare count change
Cummins
CMI
3/11
5-year growthPiotroski F-scoreNet debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CAT FY25 | CMI FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $320.1B | $72.3B |
| Revenue | $67.6B | $33.7B |
| Free cash flow | $8.9B | $2.4B |
| Net income | $8.9B | $3.0B |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 4.3% | −1.3% |
| 5-year growth | 10.1% | 11.2% |
| Share count change | −3.5% | −0.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.8% | 25.3% |
| Operating margin | 16.5% | 12.0% |
| Net margin | 13.1% | 8.8% |
| FCF margin | 13.2% | 7.1% |
| Return on capital | 18.5% | 18.3% |
| Return on equity | 43.5% | 26.2% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $26.2B | $3.6B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.0x | 0.7x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $7.9B | $1.1B |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 29.8x | 26.7x |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

