Caterpillar vs Oshkosh
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Caterpillar and Oshkosh side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Caterpillar is the larger business, with $67.6B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $10.4B for Oshkosh, about 6.5 times as much.
- Caterpillar grew revenue faster (4.3%, against −2.9%).
- Caterpillar kept more of each dollar of sales as operating profit (16.5% operating margin, against 9.0%).
- Caterpillar turned more of its sales into free cash flow (13.2% FCF margin, against 5.9%).
- Caterpillar earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (18.5%, against 14.8%).
- Investors pay more for each dollar of Caterpillar’s earnings: a P/E of 29.8x against 14.8x for Oshkosh.
Who comes out ahead
Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Caterpillar
CAT
10/11
Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreShare count change
Oshkosh
OSK
1/11
Net debt / EBITDA
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CAT FY25 | OSK FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $320.1B | $8.4B |
| Revenue | $67.6B | $10.4B |
| Free cash flow | $8.9B | $618M |
| Net income | $8.9B | $647M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 4.3% | −2.9% |
| 5-year growth | 10.1% | 8.7% |
| Share count change | −3.5% | −1.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.8% | 17.5% |
| Operating margin | 16.5% | 9.0% |
| Net margin | 13.1% | 6.2% |
| FCF margin | 13.2% | 5.9% |
| Return on capital | 18.5% | 14.8% |
| Return on equity | 43.5% | 14.9% |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $26.2B | $692M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.0x | 0.6x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $7.9B | $408M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 29.8x | 14.8x |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 5 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

