Skip to content
stoqly
en

Languages

Figures come from SEC filings, which are in English. Company and industry names stay as filed.

$ USD

Popular

All currencies

Data is in US dollars, converted at the ECB reference rate of Oct 26, 2026.

Caterpillar vs Oshkosh

Add, change or remove companies; up to four.

KIRA’s take AI analyst

I put Caterpillar and Oshkosh side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:

Who comes out ahead

Of the 11 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.

Caterpillar

CAT

10/11

Revenue growth5-year growthGross marginOperating marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalReturn on equityPiotroski F-scoreShare count change

Oshkosh

OSK

1/11

Net debt / EBITDA

Side by side

Best in the row

Latest fiscal year CAT FY25 OSK FY25
Size
Market cap $320.1B $8.4B
Revenue $67.6B $10.4B
Free cash flow $8.9B $618M
Net income $8.9B $647M
Growth
Revenue growth 4.3% −2.9%
5-year growth 10.1% 8.7%
Share count change −3.5% −1.9%
Profitability
Gross margin 33.8% 17.5%
Operating margin 16.5% 9.0%
Net margin 13.1% 6.2%
FCF margin 13.2% 5.9%
Return on capital 18.5% 14.8%
Return on equity 43.5% 14.9%
Balance sheet
Net debt $26.2B $692M
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0x 0.6x
Dividends and buybacks $7.9B $408M
Valuation & quality
P/E 29.8x 14.8x
Piotroski F-score 6 5

Ten years

Revenue

CAT OSK

Operating margin

CAT OSK

Free cash flow

CAT OSK

Return on capital

CAT OSK

Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.

↑ ↓ to move · ↵ to open