Church & Dwight vs Energizer
Add, change or remove companies; up to four.
KIRA’s take AI analyst
I put Church & Dwight and Energizer side by side, using each one’s latest annual report. Here is what stands out:
- Church & Dwight is the larger business, with $6.2B of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.0B for Energizer, about 2.1 times as much.
- Energizer grew revenue faster (2.3%, against 1.6%).
- Church & Dwight turned more of its sales into free cash flow (17.6% FCF margin, against 2.1%).
- Church & Dwight earned a higher return on the capital invested in it (14.6%, against 11.1%).
Who comes out ahead
Of the 9 measures where higher (or lower) is clearly better, how many each company leads.
Church & Dwight
CHD
7/9
5-year growthGross marginNet marginFCF marginReturn on capitalNet debt / EBITDAShare count change
Energizer
ENR
2/9
Revenue growthPiotroski F-score
Side by side
Best in the row
| Latest fiscal year | CHD FY25 | ENR FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | $25.1B | $1.5B |
| Revenue | $6.2B | $3.0B |
| Free cash flow | $1.1B | $63.2M |
| Net income | $737M | $239M |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| 5-year growth | 4.9% | 1.5% |
| Share count change | −1.1% | −1.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.7% | 41.8% |
| Operating margin | 17.4% | — |
| Net margin | 11.9% | 8.1% |
| FCF margin | 17.6% | 2.1% |
| Return on capital | 14.6% | 11.1% |
| Return on equity | 17.6% | — |
| Balance sheet | ||
| Net debt | $1.8B | $3.3B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.4x | 5.8x |
| Dividends and buybacks | $1.2B | $177M |
| Valuation & quality | ||
| P/E | 33.8x | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 |
Ten years
Revenue
Operating margin
Free cash flow
Return on capital
Each company's latest fiscal year; fiscal years end in different months. The best value in each row is highlighted where higher (or lower) is clearly better. Not investment advice.